← Back to home

Medical support and rescue

We answer one question for operations where the answer is not obvious: if someone is seriously injured here, what happens in the next four hours? That means the care level on site, the equipment and drugs that back it, the evacuation route, the receiving hospital, and the person authorized to start all of it. The measure we hold ourselves to is that an injured person is treated and gets home safely.

What the work covers

The medical concept is the deliverable. It states the medical capability to be held at the site, and it derives that from distance and time to definitive care rather than from a job title. A wind farm two hours off the coast in a sea state that grounds the helicopter needs a different answer from a film set forty minutes outside Amman, even when both are staffed by "a paramedic". We write the equipment and drug list against that capability, plan the MEDEVAC chain end to end including the handover points nobody rehearses, and specify the staffing profile precisely enough that you can hire against it and audit what turns up.

Where an operation is already running, the same work usually starts as a gap review: what the concept promises, what is physically on site, and what would happen tonight.

Concept first, staffing second

The most common request we get is to supply a medic. The most common mistake is already in the wording. One person changes little while it is still unsettled where a patient is taken, who provides the transport, who decides, and what equipment is actually on site.

So we assess the situation first, build the concept from it, settle the logistics, and only then staff it. That sometimes costs an extra week and looks like a detour at the procurement stage. In a real event it is the difference between someone who can work and someone who watches.

Who delivers on the ground

Medical care is regulated, and it is delivered by providers licensed where the patient is. We do not put ourselves between a patient and that license. We specify the standard, select the provider against it, brief the medics who staff the site, and verify what is delivered. One piece of evidence we can talk about openly is Medics on Tour. It runs with MediResponse, a licensed Advanced Life Support service, and the license, the ambulances and the medical responsibility sit with them.

Local medical teams know their receiving hospitals, their drug availability and their real transport routes better than any visiting team can. Our job is to hold one quality standard across all of them: selection against the same criteria, briefing in the same format, and one place where the responsibility sits.

Standards we work to

QualificationNotfallsanitäter (Germany) and Dipl. Rettungssanitäter HF (Switzerland), the highest non-physician EMS qualification in each country.
Standards of careCare follows the 2025 editions of the ERC and AHA guidelines, published together on 22 October 2025 and both built on the ILCOR consensus process. Under threat, care follows TCCC under the Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care and, in civilian settings, TECC under C-TECC. Beyond that we work to the established course standards for trauma and medical emergencies, meaning PHTLS, ITLS and AMLS, because an operation does not get to choose which kind of emergency turns up. Providers are selected and audited against them.
Remote and expedition medicineIts own field with its own guidance, such as the Wilderness Medical Society clinical practice guidelines and the Diploma in Remote and Offshore Medicine of the Faculty of Pre-Hospital Care at the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. What is decided here is not the diagnosis alone but whether to move or treat in place, without imaging or a laboratory behind you. The leadership team holds relevant qualifications and a doctorate in progress for this, alongside university teaching in hazard management.
Offshore and maritimeBoth environments follow the same logic, which is why we plan them together. The governing planning variable shifts from the route to hospital onto the weather window, because sea state, visibility and wind limits decide whether a helicopter launches at all. A concept that has not worked through the case where it does not is incomplete. Just as decisive is the rescue itself, meaning how an injured person is brought out from a working position at height, inside a tower or below deck and handed over, how the alerting chain runs, and how the first responders on board or on the installation are trained for it. Planning that chain and testing it in exercises is our contribution and the essential one. Execution requires a team, as a rule the medic together with a height rescue team of technicians. Our management has worked as an offshore paramedic since 2023, and access and safety training follows the GWO standard. On the vessel side the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 sets the frame. Standard A4.1 requires a medicine chest, medical equipment and a medical guide, each specified by ship type, crew size and trading area and subject to regular inspection, together with radio medical advice available around the clock and free of charge to the ship, provided in every contracting state through a TMAS service.
Time to definitive careThe planning variable everything else follows from. We state it in the concept as a number, with the assumptions and the weather or daylight conditions that break it.
VerificationThis register names the standards the work follows. The personal qualifications behind them go to clients in full over an encrypted channel, verifiable with the issuing bodies.

Questions we get asked

Do you work to the golden hour?

Not as a blanket promise, because the evidence does not support one. The phrase goes back to R Adams Cowley in the 1970s and was never supported by data of his own. A systematic review by Harmsen and colleagues in the journal Injury (2015) examined twenty studies on the relationship between prehospital time and mortality. Across trauma patients as a whole the review found no consistent relationship. Where speed did matter was in penetrating trauma with unstable circulation and in severe head injury. For everyone else what counted was the type and quality of care given on scene, not transport speed.

What matters more is that in many operating environments an hour to surgical care is not achievable at all. Offshore in a storm, at night across open country, or anywhere the nearest suitable hospital is four hours away, a target figure changes nothing.

So we plan from the real time rather than the desired one. The longer the journey, the more has to be possible on scene, the earlier the decision to move has to fall, and the more precisely it has to be settled who makes it. The concept states the actual time to definitive care, the assumptions behind it, and what follows from that for equipment, qualification and decision points.

What actually covers a deployed medic abroad?

Three things, each checked separately, none of which comes with a job title. Recognition of the qualification in the country of deployment. A named medical direction carrying responsibility for the protocols a non-physician medic works under, and reachable when a decision goes beyond that medic's scope. And professional indemnity, which for work outside the usual scope almost always needs a specific extension.

Where a provider has no medical direction we put one in place. Without it neither the liability nor the insurance usually holds, and prescription drugs cannot lawfully be procured. We work with physician partners in the country concerned.

Carrying controlled drugs across borders is a separate problem. The rules are written for individuals with their own prescription, not for a team holding group stock. We settle that before deployment, not at customs.

Can you just supply us a medic?

We can arrange one, and often do. On its own it rarely helps. What works is the whole chain, meaning the concept, the equipment and supplies, an agreed receiving facility, a route out, and the people who operate it. A medic without that chain is the person who will be blamed for an outcome that was decided before they arrived. So the concept comes first, even when it takes a week.

Our insurer already provides medical evacuation. Why plan it again?

An evacuation policy covers cost and an assistance provider organizes the aircraft. Neither one gets the patient from the platform, the tunnel or the desert site to the airfield. That first leg decides the outcome, and who covers it is regulated very differently from one environment to the next. Offshore it is normally in the contract, with a named helicopter operator and defined weather limits. At sea it usually falls to SAR or the coastguard, a body you do not contract and whose availability depends on the sea area and the situation. On land and on remote projects it is frequently not arranged at all, and that is where the gap opens.

For the second leg, meaning transfer over distance and repatriation, it is worth asking who accredits the operator. CAMTS is the reference in North America and EURAMI the one used across European and international repatriation networks, with separate accreditations for fixed wing, rotary wing and medical escort on scheduled flights. For the first leg off an installation or a vessel these accreditations say much less, because what governs there is the contract with the helicopter operator, the SAR authority for that sea area, and the weather limits.

Can you place a medic inside a close protection team?

Yes, and it is a different role from covering a fixed site. The medic moves with the principal, carries little visible equipment, and must not get in the way of the team's work. TCCC belongs to the trade but falls short as the only training. Someone trained on wound patterns alone stalls when the principal has a heart attack, reacts to something, or has left their regular medication behind. We plan the role broadly enough for that, and draw on civilian, low profile or armored ambulances and their crews depending on the situation.

Do you cover events?

Yes, as concept and command. Event medical cover is a staffing and command problem more than a clinical one: how many crews, positioned where, under whose control, with what route out when 40,000 people are between the casualty and the gate. Alongside that sits coordination with everyone involved, meaning the promoter, the authorities, the ambulance service, fire, police and stewarding, with shared communications that still work when the mobile network is saturated.

Crews are sized against a recognized model that accounts for how far anyone has to walk across the site, not just the headcount. Which model we use and on what assumptions is stated in the concept. The treating crews are local and licensed.

Other capabilities

Travel risk management and duty of care

Travel risk programs built to ISO 31030, thresholds through escalation.

Learn more

Protective services and close protection

Protective concepts, advance work and command, low profile by design.

Learn more

Risk and threat assessment

Country and site analysis, surveys and audits that end in decisions.

Learn more

Crisis and emergency management

Crisis structures with named roles, exercised before handover.

Learn more

Training and briefings

HEAT, medical and crisis training, built on the real deployment.

Learn more

Talk it through first

Every engagement starts with a confidential conversation, and it is free. Describe the operation and the concern. We will tell you honestly whether this is the right capability, another one, or nothing at all.

enquiries@foxpedition.com